Australian voters have rejected a proposal contained in a referendum to give more recognition to indigenous people.
The proposal included a new advisory body that supporters said would have helped to reflect the voices of indigenous people in national policies.
Indigenous people in Australia had been openly discriminated against until the 1970s. They still have lower household income, lower educational levels, and shorter life expectancy compared with others in the country.
The referendum asked voters whether the Constitution should be revised to allow for the establishment of a new advisory body to reflect indigenous voices.
They were also asked whether the Constitution should clearly state that indigenous people are the First Peoples of Australia.
The election committee announced that the proposal was rejected by a majority vote. About 40 percent were for the proposal, and 60 percent were opposed.
Opinion polls early this year had indicated that the "Yes" votes outnumbered the "No" votes.
Some critics have said the power of the new body had not been clearly defined. Others said that giving indigenous people preferential treatment would divide the nation.
The referendum was high on Prime Minister Anthony Albanese's agenda. He acknowledged it was not the outcome he had hoped for, but respected the voters' decision.
He expressed the hope that a new generation of indigenous leaders will emerge through discussions that have been revitalized by the referendum.
Australia touts itself as a multicultural country. But the divisive referendum has highlighted difficulties in solving indigenous issues.
The proposal included a new advisory body that supporters said would have helped to reflect the voices of indigenous people in national policies.
Indigenous people in Australia had been openly discriminated against until the 1970s. They still have lower household income, lower educational levels, and shorter life expectancy compared with others in the country.
The referendum asked voters whether the Constitution should be revised to allow for the establishment of a new advisory body to reflect indigenous voices.
They were also asked whether the Constitution should clearly state that indigenous people are the First Peoples of Australia.
The election committee announced that the proposal was rejected by a majority vote. About 40 percent were for the proposal, and 60 percent were opposed.
Opinion polls early this year had indicated that the "Yes" votes outnumbered the "No" votes.
Some critics have said the power of the new body had not been clearly defined. Others said that giving indigenous people preferential treatment would divide the nation.
The referendum was high on Prime Minister Anthony Albanese's agenda. He acknowledged it was not the outcome he had hoped for, but respected the voters' decision.
He expressed the hope that a new generation of indigenous leaders will emerge through discussions that have been revitalized by the referendum.
Australia touts itself as a multicultural country. But the divisive referendum has highlighted difficulties in solving indigenous issues.
Similar Readings (5 items)
Thousands rally in Australia to support Indigenous rights
Australian PM urges Yes vote ahead of indigenous poll
Australia to vote on recognizing First Peoples in Constitution
summary of Taiwan referendum fails to clear threshold to restart nuclear plant
Australia seeks to slash immigration
Summary
Referendum on granting more recognition to indigenous Australians failed, with 60% of voters rejecting the proposal. The proposal included an advisory body for indigenous voices and a statement acknowledging them as First Peoples in the Constitution. Despite lower household income, education
Statistics
247
Words1
Read CountDetails
ID: b54ad286-ae07-4a36-8a0f-f65b2b2e0a7b
Category ID: nhk
URL: https://www3.nhk.or.jp/nhkworld/en/news/20231015_06/
Date: Oct. 15, 2023
Created: 2023/10/15 08:38
Updated: 2025/12/08 22:34
Last Read: 2023/10/15 20:04